 | | Re: 2009/2010 LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) Election is open
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, When I log in at LDraw.org, the LSC election no longer appears in ballot page you link. I see it listed again when I log out. (Tested in Safari and Firefox.) How can I vote? Jim (15 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | 2009/2010 LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) Election is open
|
|
The 2009/2010 LDraw Standards Committee[1] election is now open. To vote, please visit (URL) and log in with your user account. Next, visit the ballot page on LDraw.org here: (URL) LDraw organization members may vote and you may vote for up to five (...) (15 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) Maybe Google Code + Google Wave? Preferably something that won't break if the person hosting the site has a HD crash or looses his password... Plus, I already have a gmail account! :) Mike (15 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Open cylinder primitives, any demand?
|
|
(...) Here is a list I compiled of many parts that could make use of a cylinder that's open at both ends. There may be more. 6029A 3957 104 2569 30322 30209 3062B 33286 43888 4740 3960s01 3961s01 6942 75535 6177s01 30148 4360 4341 70501 529 6260 (...) (15 years ago, 17-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) -Orion (15 years ago, 15-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) I whouldn't lose hope we can go back in time and see it all over again (URL) (15 years ago, 15-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) I suggested several months ago to open source it and host it on Source Forge or somewhere. I and everyone else seem to have forgotten about it though. It would still be a neat idea. Mike (15 years ago, 14-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Assembled parts, ~ and categories
|
|
(...) Thanks for make that clear now. I have just also link this post in the wiki ((URL) so we can find it much quicker in the future. I have also put there a lot of other stuff that I feel we should keep for future use. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 14-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Assembled parts, ~ and categories
|
|
(...) 1) the leading ~ should be enforced for files in parts/s. 2a) a leading ~ is optional for files in parts, but should be present for physical components that are always delivered in combination with another. 2b) we need a better way to deal (...) (15 years ago, 13-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Assembled parts, ~ and categories
|
|
(...) As I am in the beta testing for the new DATHeader I need to have decisions for the above questions. At present many of the above is mixed on the PT. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 13-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
