 | | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) I whouldn't lose hope we can go back in time and see it all over again (URL) (15 years ago, 15-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Datsville Link
|
|
(...) I suggested several months ago to open source it and host it on Source Forge or somewhere. I and everyone else seem to have forgotten about it though. It would still be a neat idea. Mike (15 years ago, 14-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Assembled parts, ~ and categories
|
|
(...) Thanks for make that clear now. I have just also link this post in the wiki ((URL) so we can find it much quicker in the future. I have also put there a lot of other stuff that I feel we should keep for future use. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 14-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Assembled parts, ~ and categories
|
|
(...) 1) the leading ~ should be enforced for files in parts/s. 2a) a leading ~ is optional for files in parts, but should be present for physical components that are always delivered in combination with another. 2b) we need a better way to deal (...) (15 years ago, 13-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Assembled parts, ~ and categories
|
|
(...) As I am in the beta testing for the new DATHeader I need to have decisions for the above questions. At present many of the above is mixed on the PT. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 13-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
