 | | Re: Part naming and hard colored parts
|
|
(...) Hi Chris, thanks for the informations. I missed the first article (often I'm immersed in programming and don't take care of news). With the information on line 4 I got all I need (expecially for hard colored parts) and will be implemented in (...) (15 years ago, 20-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LSynth 3.0 setup tutorial updated
|
|
Hi folks, I have updated the LSynth 3.0 setup tutorial at: (URL) also moved it from the betatest section to its permanent location. Furthermore I added more examples to: (URL) revised the troubleshooting page: (URL) In the updated tutorial you will (...) (15 years ago, 20-May-09, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hi Chris, Thanks for the news. I should not be surprised that you are on top of this. I understand the drawing the line in the sand. 2009-02 sounds great. Thanks, Kevin (15 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
(...) Many of the Technic "beams" got re-cycled through the Parts Tracker in 2009-01 for primitive optimisation and BFC reasons. I took the opportunity to implement something that we had been talking about for some time - to name these types of (...) (15 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Part naming for technic liftarms vs. beams
|
|
Hi gang, I want to start by saying thanks to all those involved in creating parts and managing the parts library. We toolsmiths would not have a job if it were'nt for the LDraw parts library. I have a question about naming conventions with respect (...) (15 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Part naming and hard colored parts
|
|
(...) Sergio From the complete library update that was 2008-01, the !LDRAW_ORG line (line 4 of every file) should tell you what you need to know. Full details are in the header specification at (URL) Generic colour parts have an identifier of "Part" (...) (15 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Part naming and hard colored parts
|
|
Hi everybody, as many of you already know, I'm the programmer of SR 3D Builder. Using the lDraw prebuild library has been for me the starting point for developing my application, but as things become complex I have to assume some convention in my (...) (15 years ago, 19-May-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader NEW as .NET application (version 2.0.1)
|
|
(...) I have just tested the changed DATHeader also on UBUNTU/Linux with MONO. IT WORKS!!! Now as I have realized that there are differences between some functions that do the same on windows enviroment, but totally different on linux machines I am (...) (15 years ago, 18-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader NEW as .NET application (version 2.0.1)
|
|
(...) I have now found what happend. I use under windows the following code for a messagebox that gives an result back: answer = msgbox() But this does not work under MONO. Here I have to use: answer = messagebox.show(). So I have to check the (...) (15 years ago, 18-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DATHeader NEW as .NET application (version 2.0.1)
|
|
(...) At present I have no idea why color and rotation is not removed, but I will investigate. I did not checked the hand for being under MONO or not, only the function itself as I have detected trouble with that function under MONO. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 17-May-09, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
