 | | Re: LPub Rotation Step angle woes
|
|
(...) snip (...) Alas. That is what I'm supposed to see, not what I actually do see. Something is convinced that the 0,0,0 rotation is actually equal to the default 3D angle, which causes requests for the real default 3D angle to be over-rotated. (...) (16 years ago, 6-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: personal OMR (now 879 sets)
|
|
(...) If you have looked carefully throught all the stuff you would have seen that not all are done by myself! I also like if I get models build by others to put into that OMR! cu mikeheide (16 years ago, 4-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: personal OMR (now 879 sets)
|
|
(...) much time on your hands! :-) (16 years ago, 4-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub Rotation Step angle woes
|
|
(...) It is not coincidence that it works. LPub is written to handle it your way. STEPs and ROTSTEPs that are not preceded by type 1 through 5 lines are not treated as step. (...) Kevin (16 years ago, 4-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub Rotation Step angle woes
|
|
(...) Well, I've definitely been doing it wrong! I guess it's just coincidence that my approach renders OK in LPub. Plus, Bricksmith doesn't treat rotsteps as steps - yet! Jim (16 years ago, 4-Nov-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
