|
|
 | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) I'd say that DPM or DPMM make perfect sense. The thing is, your description said that units are all in CM or IN, and that M and MM aren't supported. And yet, you force the user to specify which units to use in either IN, M, or MM. That seems (...) (18 years ago, 6-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) When I looked around on the net I saw references to DPM and DPMM.... I didn't see DPCM.... it does make complete sense to use DPCM, but I wasn't sure people would think its a standard name. Kevin (18 years ago, 6-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) Shouldn't that be: 0 !LPUB RESOLUTION <value> (DPI|DPCM) Based on this: (...) --Travis (18 years ago, 6-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: LPub 4 Status
|
| (...) SNIP (...) Only one question is left! When can we get that? cu mikeheide (18 years ago, 6-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | LPub 4 Status
|
| I've got the math and implementation of resolution (dots per inch/meter/millimeter) as well as magnification for controlling model size relative to the page all worked out. Magnification 1.0 means a model that appears 8 inches wide will just fit in (...) (18 years ago, 6-Mar-08, to lugnet.cad.dev) !
|
|
