 | | Re: LDD goes Technic
|
|
(...) I must say they chose a very creative solution to the issue of how to run cables :) (so as not to tease, each end of a cable is represented by the modular connector and a small length of wire. Colored arrows are used to match up which end runs (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDLink: reversibly merge part libraries
|
|
Hi, folks. After reading some of the recent posts discussing support for unofficial parts and part directories, I decided to release this script I wrote to help manage the unofficial parts I use. I keep my unofficial parts in a parallel part library (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | CATEGORY and KEYWORD extension ratified by the LSC
|
|
The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) has ratified the CATEGORY and KEYWORD language extension. The most major change between the ratified specification and the de-facto standard is to officially move the creation of new part categories away from the (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Convention for directoried for unofficial parts?
|
|
(...) The following files in LDView's source tree contain the LDrawIni stuff: LDLoader/LDrawIni.c LDLoader/LDrawIni.h LDLoader/LDrawInP.h There's a #include <TCFoundation/TCDefines.h> near the top of LDrawIni.c. You can delete that; the only reason (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Convention for directoried for unofficial parts?
|
|
(...) I'm using Qt, and LPub is under GPL, so this sounds perfect. I'm all for standardization, so this sounds great. (...) I'm not looking to judge or criticize anyone. All of our programming efforts are works in progress, so these self analysis' (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
