 | | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature
|
|
(...) I support this general notion, would like to see everything in LDU and think the original molded description should go in KEYWORDS (perhaps with a qualifyer "molded" or something?) ~~~~ (18 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Tyre (tire) nomenclature
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) Hi Chris, I really think LDU units should be used no matter the system. (Almost?) everything else uses them so it would be much less confusing. Tim (18 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Tyre (tire) nomenclature
|
|
Mike Heidemann and others make a good point here (URL) about qualifying the LDraw descriptions for tyres. Current commercial nomenclature follows an ISO standard (see for example (URL)) typically using Width"/"AspectRatio"...mDiameter, where (...) (18 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New parts - missing stud2b and stud4b
|
|
(...) [trimmed] (...) Thanks - I updated them to use stud2. (...) I updated your part to use a 4LDu cylinder, the stud4a primitive (underside ring stud without the edge lines) and added the outer edge line separately. Chris (18 years ago, 30-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for a BrickJournal article..
|
|
(...) Re-surfaces literally or figuratively? :-) Bad pun given his line of work... I know the awarding is a little ways off but whatever help you need getting the plaque made, I'm willing to have it made like years past. Or, I can do a handoff and (...) (18 years ago, 29-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad)
|
