 | | Re: LSC - request for defining a WORKING connection database standard
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, I think "working" needs a tool. 1. there is a tool 2. there is a developping database There is no chicken-egg problem: the tool always precedes the database. Would you model parts without MLCad, LeoCad or LDraw? I doubt anybody (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC - request for defining a WORKING connection database standard
|
|
(...) Note that Rosco already did take a crack at a few, including generating some images for them, and in doing so, found a problem in one I created, and caused me to decide to add fields to the connectionTypeBox, which is goodness. Thanks! (...) I (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC - request for defining a WORKING connection database standard
|
|
(...) While a connection database could be helpful, I just cant help thinking that a relationship/constrain system like solidworks and Pro/Engineer use could acheive a lot more. It could certainly be a start, then simplified - so the CAD (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC - request for defining a WORKING connection database standard
|
|
I'm not sure where this standard definition is at these days, or whether it could be used to automate what I'm doing by a clever MetaWiki robot coder, but I (and others) started capturing some connection information in BrickWiki ( (URL) ) You can (...) (19 years ago, 17-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.lcd, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Affirmation process of the CA
|
|
(...) This one: (URL) was working on an update but he's on vacation right now. I don't want to sent any time table but rest assured it is being addressed. -Orion (19 years ago, 16-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Affirmation process of the CA
|
|
Hello, which List of authors who have not yet affirmed the CA for Ldraw is up to date? (URL) hope there will be an update in the next months. CU Bernd (19 years ago, 16-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Given that self-nominations are allowed, and seconds to the nominations aren't required, do you think perhaps it might be good next year to simply require all nominations be self-nominations? We then wouldn't have to worry about people (...) (19 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | 6 wide autorack
|
|
i was finally able to complete a working design for a autorack, pictures are here (URL) moderation) (URL) model is only single level due to size, however i am happy to say you can fit some cars in it, and maybe even a small truck to. (19 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) Nope. The only requirement is the nominee meets eligibility. -Orion (19 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
Do these nominations need to be seconded? Thanks. --Travis (19 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
