 | | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) HURRAY!!! I made it through gonta's board and got in touch with him. stay tuned. w. www.holly-wood.it (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) It's the same file. Are you having another bad day with case sensitive filesystems? Don (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Well, I actually want to take this kind of thing to the LSC for review. (...) I had not made it this far. I had just made it to the concept phase. There are a few things that control hose synthesis; hose type, hose segment part type, segment (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Ah, that's good to hear. (...) Waitaminute!! That's what I said a year ago, but you appeared to get suckered in by the getopt proposal. Oh well. (...) Short instructions: (URL) instructions: (URL) instructions: (URL) Another thing I'd like to (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I spent a bit of time working out how to reply to this mail without coming across as an open source zealot :) (...) I always thought open source relied on the concept of copyright (one of the 3 major concepts in intellectual property). It is (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
As a programmer for some 28+ years I have extreme reservations about Open source or as i call it "socialized" programming. The entire concept of open source flies in the face of intellectual property rights. That being who owns the rights to (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.0 not seeing POV-Ray 3.5?
|
|
(...) Thanks Orion, I updated my site. Kevin (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) a library sort of thing, like Lars taught me about L3P. (...) I don't like the getopt format because it is so different than standard issue meta-commands. (...) Well, I have to get hooked in and put in a (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.0 not seeing POV-Ray 3.5?
|
|
(...) That is indeed where I downloaded it from! I'd be extremely grateful if you could send the correct version to me, just remove the obvious spam-trap from my email. :) With thanks, -Rich Mackin- (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.0 not seeing POV-Ray 3.5?
|
|
(...) Did you download LPub from here: (URL) so, there's an error with this distribution. I can send you the correct file if you'd like. -Orion (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Ugh! That's probably because I went the 'Ownerdraw' route to get the colors. I'll take a look at it when real life permits (couple of weeks...). -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) hi Daniel, I have tested GLIDE 0.7 and i must say it looks promising. As simple as it is now, the interface seems very effective. In a more stable and polished state, undoubtly it would be my preferred editor for small models. It's difficult (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LPub 2.0 not seeing POV-Ray 3.5?
|
|
Hi all, Having some problems with LPub 2.0 - namely, when I attempt to start it up, I get an error message saying that it can't find the registry entries for POV-Ray, even though I have POV-Ray 3.5 installed on my Windows 98SE system. I have a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) You should take a peek at it. I use it to open an ldlist part finder window so I can drag and drop parts into ldglite. Hey that reminds me, the new colored fonts in ldlist 4 look bad on my system. Here's a picture: (URL) font used in the (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I'm fairly certain that my DATBase and L3Check units (individual linetype manipulating classes and Error checking from L3P code) are compatible with a variety of Pascal compliers. DATModel (classes for model level maniplation) may pose a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> skrev i meddelandet news:Hw88DL.1D7H@lugnet.com... (...) units used (...) own (...) I'm using Delphi 5 (Both at work and for fun). Haven't really looked much at LDDP yet but the plugin architecture (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I have the beginnings of this with the DATBase, DATModel, and L3Check units used for LDDP. I've been considering splintering these units off into their own project. The only thing hindering me is the (apparent) lack of Delphi programmers in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Yes, I think we can go in that direction. It would certainly make updating errors a lot simpler. And since most of LDDP's functions manipulate the text in some way it's easily doable. (...) No, but there is hope. See above -Orion (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Then you should suggest that on the web page, or in the book. People forget what they discussed on lugnet after a week or so. [snip: many, many lsynth features. It's time for me to buy the book] (...) That sounds good, but will lsynthcp still (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
