 | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I'm fairly certain that my DATBase and L3Check units (individual linetype manipulating classes and Error checking from L3P code) are compatible with a variety of Pascal compliers. DATModel (classes for model level maniplation) may pose a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> skrev i meddelandet news:Hw88DL.1D7H@lugnet.com... (...) units used (...) own (...) I'm using Delphi 5 (Both at work and for fun). Haven't really looked much at LDDP yet but the plugin architecture (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I have the beginnings of this with the DATBase, DATModel, and L3Check units used for LDDP. I've been considering splintering these units off into their own project. The only thing hindering me is the (apparent) lack of Delphi programmers in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Yes, I think we can go in that direction. It would certainly make updating errors a lot simpler. And since most of LDDP's functions manipulate the text in some way it's easily doable. (...) No, but there is hope. See above -Orion (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Then you should suggest that on the web page, or in the book. People forget what they discussed on lugnet after a week or so. [snip: many, many lsynth features. It's time for me to buy the book] (...) That sounds good, but will lsynthcp still (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
