 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) I think this looks very comprehensive - and I think the idea of choosing a small group of dedicated people to actually take the proposal forward is the way to go. I think this proposal is definitely a step in the right direction. ROSCO (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ML Cad and AMD
|
|
(...) I do it *all* the time. Kevin (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) Do you mind if they're destroyed? It's easier to measure them if you don't care about having the piece be intact afterwards. Alas, I still don't know how to code in .dat - only in .dwg/.stl/.3ds. If you could find someone to clean up the parts (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Windows XP?
|
|
(...) ALL LDraw applications work in Windows XP that I am aware of. There was been NO report of any application NOT working. -AHui LDarw Help Desk (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Windows XP?
|
|
Hi all, I was just wondering if there's a comprehensive list of which Ldraw tools are compatible with Windows XP? As Micro$oft has now announced that 98 will no longer be officially supported I'm looking to upgrade.... ROSCO (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Resolution
|
|
(...) For general features, the standard rule of thumb is to model details which are 1LDU or larger. To cleanly model some features, you certainly can run into decimal places -- I typically go to 2 or 3 decimal places in part files. Any use of the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) AFAIK, no one has done them yet. It would be nice if someone could volunteer. They're rather complex parts to make, though. (I'm not a parts author myself) -Tim (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Masks
|
|
(...) I've been wondering that myself. I have many to offer to mail to people if they need/want them (for CAD work.) -Dan (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Dan, there seems to be some confusion here on your part. Hopefully other posters have cleared it up for you, but I want to go on record here on what the vision was. If it wasn't clear from the proposal, that's at least partly my fault since I (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
|
(...) Sorry, I should have said, "how LDraw.org should function as an organization in the future." -Tim (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
