 | | Re: Is it important the difference of these parts?
|
|
(...) To me personally it is not important at all. But the LCAD community is large, we use the parts librry in different ways, and I rest assured that for some people there is a good reason. /Tore (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
|
|
I personally edited 3001.dat to be BFC compliant. I'd be interested if it's not done correctly. If you have a Parts libray as of at least this past spring, I would think you'd have the 3001.dat that I 'fixed'... Well I think it got approved around (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
|
|
Well, a lot of them. 3001.dat, box.dat ... They show invisible faces in BFCTool. Well, it's been a while since I've installed the original parts library that came with LDraw. Maybe some of the files have changed since then. I'll try that. Thanks, (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | BFC Ceritfied Parts Question
|
|
I've notice a few parts on the Parts Tracker that are BFC certified, but some of their component primitives are not. Can justifiably I certify these parts? If I can, why? What if the part is BFC certified and then later on the primitive is BFC (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC Utility Inconsistencies
|
|
Do you have any particular parts that demonstrate the inconsistencies you are seeing? -Kyle (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
