 | | Updated 30399.dat [DAT]
|
|
I have fixed the duplicated lines according to L3P. Is this the correct name? Also, do I need to submit this to the tracker? If so, how do I get an account? I hope this one is correct, I don't think any of the parts that I have made have been OK'd. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Updated 30400.dat [DAT]
|
|
I fixed this one's duplicated lines as well. 0 Brick 4 x 18 0 Name: 30400.dat 0 Author: Ronald Scott Moody <RonaldScottMoody@netscape.net> 0 Unofficial Element 0 1 16 120 4 20 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 160 4 20 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Trouble with POV 3.5
|
|
(...) I have found 3.5 to be almost twice as fast as 3.1 with the same files - tested on a PII, P3 and P4. Most incompatabilities can be removed with the version directive. (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Trouble with POV 3.5
|
|
<snip> (...) Try this link: (URL) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: ASSOCIATE (was: Re: Renaming of 2916.dat)
|
|
(...) WAY better than using naming to overload. 2916 and 2917 get at best a very weak association if they have train in their name. With the ASSOCIATE keyword extension it becomes quite explicit what their connection is. (and parts can also have (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
