|
| | Re: 6195 neptune discovery lab
|
| (...) I used ledit. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
| | | | Re: [not a part, a wish] Pneumatics
|
| (...) Uhm, I've got it started allright, but it may take a few weeks before it's finished, I'm rather hung up in other stuff at the time. I'm working on the large cylinder, and am planning to tweak it into the large pump, when finished. Regards (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| | | | Re: LDS ver 0.28
|
| GOTO was very easy to program. :o) A little more seriously now: I think it belongs to the BASIC-like syntax I have chosen. Especially in IF statements. Anyway, noone is forced to [ab]use it. I don't think WHILE-WEND will be too hard to code, and it (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | Re: LDS ver 0.28
|
| (...) Better to have both. GOTO has its uses, albeit rare. --Todd (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | Re: LDS ver 0.28
|
| (...) Good!! (...) Reasoning for GOTO? GOTO is a construct which can very easily be abused. better to have "proper" strcutures likw while-DO, repeat-until etc. Alex (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |