 | | Re: Smallest smooth cube challenge —Nathan Proudlove
|
| | | (...) I actually didn't think I would be able to do it but I stumbled upon this configuration for a 2x2, smooth cube with four pieces. (URL) Nathan (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Smallest smooth cube challenge —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) It doesn't quite work. The flange on the stud-pin leaves a gap between the brick and the lower tile. (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Smallest smooth cube challenge —Mark Riley
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I've tried that technique before (for a different project) and noticed the same gap. How about using a small bit of flex tubing inside a bit of pneumatic tubing like so: (URL) No gap: (URL) And, it's still technically 100% Lego, though I (...) (21 years ago, 27-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Smallest smooth cube challenge —Dan Sabath
|
| | | | In lugnet.build.schleim, Mark Riley wrote: <snip> (...) Bram and I were discussing this and we had both came up with this modification. If you take 4 1x1 tiles and put them end on into one of the 2x2 tiles you can use them to attach the tile to the (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Smallest smooth cube challenge —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Wow, that's clever. Nice work! So I am wondering if it is even possible to go smaller. The geometric ratio seems to suggest not, but then I keep thinking that's the smallest you can go and someone goes smaller. (21 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| | | | |
