Subject:
|
Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.schleim
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:51:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8110 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.schleim, Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.schleim, I wrote:
| |
| |
For the sake of completeness, it’s worth to mention this technique not only
works for any length, but also for any width of plate/brick. In other
words, you’re able to slant ? x 2, ? x 4 and so on by mirroring along the
diagonal as well, using an equally larger parallel ofsett.
|
|
In lugnet.build.schleim, Ross Crawford answered:
| |
Indeed. Wider bricks/plates do result in a correspondingly larger gap
though.
|
...that can be filled adequately by tiles or plates + tiles attached
snotwise.
(Oops, I just realised I’ve put this thread back on-topic, because up until
now the discussion was most about studs on top techniques. :-)
With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen.
|
Yes, but the studs were out of aschlignment. And we can talk about scheep if we
want to...
Anyway, the new 1x1 ‘cheeser’ slopes would be best to pad the gap, if it was the
right size.
Jason R
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
| (...) :-) scheep...? schafe! (or "schapen" in my native language) (...) That is a pretty good idea, does someone know any example of someone using this already? With friendly greetings, M, Moolhuysen. (18 years ago, 21-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
| (...) In lugnet.build.schleim, Ross Crawford answered: (...) ...that can be filled adequately by tiles or plates + tiles attached snotwise. (Oops, I just realised I've put this thread back on-topic, because up until now the discussion was most about (...) (18 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
