 | | Re: Chirality —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Good stuff. Seems BrickWiki fodder! I would footnote that many paired parts are not TRULY enantiomers since the logos on the studs are not reversed. But that is a very unimportant footnote since they are functionally mirrored. (19 years ago, 8-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Chirality —Christopher Masi
| | | | | (...) And we would call them what..... Yes! Diastereomers :) (...) not to the pedantic (...) Chris (19 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts)
| | | | | | |
