 | | Re: butt-to-butt connections
|
|
"Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:IByEKH.12Ln@lugnet.com... (...) 1x4 ***Technic*** plate?? What part # is that?? I have not come across a piece described as such in the catalog. Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim)
|
| |
| | Re: butt-to-butt connections
|
|
(...) I’m curious about the “studs-out” orientation as well. Either up-down or left-right (front-back). Each has their own particular spatial geometry, when talking about Lego brick. It would be help if you did something like the following (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: butt-to-butt connections
|
|
(...) What do you mean by 'on top'? Are these butt-to-butt bricks supposed to form a flat surface, or upright walls with the studs facing out left and right, or a vertical wall with studs up and down? Can you handle sticking-out bits or studs on one (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: butt-to-butt connections
|
|
(...) WHOOSH... this lower half just flew over my head. I'm not very clear on exactly what you want here. But I followed your question. Have you tried log (both 1 x 2 and 1 x 4) bricks with 2L technic rods shoved up and attached to each other (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: butt-to-butt connections
|
|
(...) In how large or small a space are you hoping to accomplish this reversal? I have an idea, but it might not fit in the scale you're envisioning. Dave! (20 years ago, 14-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
