To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 944
943  |  945
Subject: 
Re: New Model
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 16:02:50 GMT
Viewed: 
274 times
  
In lugnet.build.military, Geordan Hankinson writes:
Heya

Check out my latest model:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=22888

It's called the F-39 Makko and it is my *supposed* replacment for the F-35
maybe 30 years down the road or so. It steals many design cues from the F-35
and F-22, as it is designed to be a stealth aircraft, but I threw in alot of
my own stuff too.

Heh, very fitting name...

What I love the most about this model, is how smooth the SNOT assembly on thee
transition is from cockpit to main wings to engine. Oh, and the bottom is well
done too. You squeezed a *LOT* in there. Overall, it's a fine craft. I'd
personally love to make variants of it. :-D


Weaponry:

four internally stored air to air missiles.
eight guided small bombs. (the black things on the inside of the weapons
compartment)
2 guided 1000lb smart stealth bombs. (the red things on the landing
gear/hardpoints)

Nice, you're getting "tech-y" (drool, black, guided micro-bombs).


The F-39 also has countermeasures which are realeased through the black
triangular hole in the back.

Ah, that's what they do!


it only needs the two landing gear you see there, it is perfectly balanced
on just those two. It also has a VTOL system which you can see, yes it is
stealth that's why it needs no cover, (all though that would be cool, the
solution you see here is "Geordan's lazy cop out for why there is no cover" :P)

Well, despite your critiques, I like the VTOL system. You integrated it well
into the belly.


The top rounded area is removable and there is inner engine detail inside.
(Props to Mladen for that idea ;))

Gah! You're such a liar!

j/k ;-)


hmmm I think that's all the technical babble I need to write.

Me being stupid, I completely forgot to add cockpit detail, =^/ so ignore
the lack of detail under the canopy.

Next time... :-(


Lemme know what ya think!

-Geordan-

one more thing, would anyone be interested in instructions for this if I did
them?

You know my answer (a definite YES).

Mladen Pejic, over and out!
http://www3.sympatico.ca/mladenpejic/



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: New Model
 
(...) -snip- (...) -snip- Those first sentences got butchered. Here's what I meant: What I love the most about this model, is how smooth the transition is from cockpit to main wings to engine. Oh, and the bottom SNOT assembly is well done too. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.military)
  Re: New Model
 
(...) heh thanks getting those cylinders to fit right took some time. Oh, and the bottom is well (...) yeah I would of liked to of added a proper landing gear, but getting it to fit, and making a cover to fit in with the rest of the smooth surface (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.military)

Message is in Reply To:
  New Model
 
Heya Check out my latest model: (URL) called the F-39 Makko and it is my *supposed* replacment for the F-35 maybe 30 years down the road or so. It steals many design cues from the F-35 and F-22, as it is designed to be a stealth aircraft, but I (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.space, lugnet.build)

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR