To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 1679
1678  |  1680
Subject: 
Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military
Date: 
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:41:53 GMT
Viewed: 
34 times
  
Hey Jon,

I’m not sure if you meant to be funny or serious but I think the Berserker is absolutely hilarious! It borders on looking like one of those crackpot flying contraptions from old movie reels of the early days of aviation. This airplane is definitely a departure from reality and alternate reality, to the point that it actually steps backward and ignores the advances and conventional wisdom in warplane designs of the WWII era.

For example, the bi-wing in the front creates a tremendous blind spot for both crewmen (I assume one is a pilot and the other is a navigator or bombardier?). Perhaps the top wing is for extra lift because of the huge gat in front? If so, it may be pointless since the top wing limits crucial visibility in air-to-air combat. I believe that’s one reason why bi-plane fighters were replaced by mono-planes in WWII.

Speaking of visibility problems, that big central engine creates a HUGE lateral blind spot for the pilot (whichever side he or she is on). The poor pilot has absolutely no clue what’s happening on the other side of that big ass engine. I guess the guy or gal on the opposite side must be there as a lookout? Or do they trade off piloting the plane in combat, depending on which side the bad guy is on? Or was the Kenworth design team just drunk when they designed this thing?

Another design flaw is situating the crew on the wings. This is a very risky move because both crewmen are totally exposed to gunfire. There doesn’t seem to be much cockpit armor to protect them from direct hits or even ricochets off the other surfaces around them. And the poor saps could get shot clean off the fuselage along with the wing. Also, if the engine gets hit directly, both crewmen are totally screwed if it explodes. Since most of the engine is in the rear of the plane, the odds of a direct hit are much, much greater. With the added drag from those huge pontoons, this airplane is guaranteed to spend most of its combat time with it’s tail in the gun sights of the enemy, eventually lighting up the sky with a spectacular fireball.

So I think the Berserker sucks as a warplane and I’m hoping that was your intent. Otherwise, I’m sorry to rag on your MOC and your effort. On the positive side, it certainly is a very masterfully built Lego model. The SNOT building is superb! I also dig the color scheme and the way you used the pieces to accomplish it. This MOC offers lots of cool details and building ideas and your presentation is excellent, as always.

--Dan



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
 
(...) Dan, you have completely failed to consider the important things: 1) How well does this MOC whoosh? 2) Big honkin' gun! 3) Looks cool. -Grand Admiral .space Curator (URL) (21 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
  Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
 
(...) Jassim with the smack! Sounds good to me. I'll address your points and knock them down like the thrift-store mega bloks they are. (...) The canard was inspired by the one on the Wright Flyer. When I was building this I actually made sure the (...) (21 years ago, 17-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
  Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
 
Gotta agree with Dan, he hit the nail right on the head with that post. Despite employing SNOT techniques beautifully, this airplane seems to scrunched up. Maybe if you lengthened it a bit it would look better. I can see what you were trying to (...) (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
  Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
 
I dunno, I think you're missing the point. This Crimson Skies stuff is purely fictional, and as a fictional plane straight out of Jon's imagination, this thing is damn cool. I don't like it when insanely whacky but intensly cool stuff like this gets (...) (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
  Re: Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
 
(...) I remember reading once that the tri-wing+ concept was scrapped when it was realized that it didn't really provide any more lift potential than a bi-wing, but I suspect the switch from WWI bi-wings to WWII mono-wings had more to do with (...) (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Crimson Skies MOC: Berserker
 
When the United States collapsed it took much of the new highway system with it. Pacific Northwest based Kenworth adapted to the change and abandoned truck building for planes. (URL) Along with Boeing Syndicate, Kenworth grew to be one of the main (...) (21 years ago, 15-Mar-04, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.general, lugnet.space, FTX) !! 

45 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR