To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / 1648 (-10)
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) That's a lovely piece of microscale work there, Mark. Sometimes building on a small scale like this is far harder than building big. Very nicely done. Now where are the microfig scale f-14's for the deck? :) Adrian (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) hmmm, bulkier, more primitive guns, I think I can manage that :) thanks for the input! TRS (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
 
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX)
 
  Defense Appropriations approved (New MOCs)
 
For your viewing pleasure, more tasty hardware from the Ceti Republic: Cougar II A1: (URL) (New cupola, extra sensor gear.) Lynx Armored Vehicle: (URL) (Variants shown are Mortar Carrier and Battlefield Command systems.) Jaguar Light Tank: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) That's excellent! The shape is spot on and the little details are wonderful...ie. the command tower and the peek into the hanger from the aft. Very cool! Cheers, -Gil (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) I don't think it's the shape of your plane that makes it a stretch for CS as much as it's the high-tech looking weaponry. Exchange that stuff for some large primitive looking machine guns and I think you'd be a lot closer to the CS style... (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) I just saw this looking around on brickshelf yesterday, and was very impressed. I like that you managed to capture the shape of the carrier in a relatively small MOC. Daniel Rubin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) Not really. I don't think you understand what I was trying to point out. Your plane follows the very typical composition with two large wings forward, with a standard tail design. It looks like any given forward-prop-driven plane dating from (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
I feel kindah silly replying to my own post, but I want to let you all know that I uploaded more pictures to the Brickshelf gallery, and I also updated the MOCpages site. (URL) Gallery: (URL) some people want to know if I'm going to make a mini (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.build.microscale)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR