 | | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
(...) That's excellent! The shape is spot on and the little details are wonderful...ie. the command tower and the peek into the hanger from the aft. Very cool! Cheers, -Gil (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) I don't think it's the shape of your plane that makes it a stretch for CS as much as it's the high-tech looking weaponry. Exchange that stuff for some large primitive looking machine guns and I think you'd be a lot closer to the CS style... (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
(...) I just saw this looking around on brickshelf yesterday, and was very impressed. I like that you managed to capture the shape of the carrier in a relatively small MOC. Daniel Rubin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) Not really. I don't think you understand what I was trying to point out. Your plane follows the very typical composition with two large wings forward, with a standard tail design. It looks like any given forward-prop-driven plane dating from (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
I feel kindah silly replying to my own post, but I want to let you all know that I uploaded more pictures to the Brickshelf gallery, and I also updated the MOCpages site. (URL) Gallery: (URL) some people want to know if I'm going to make a mini (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.build.microscale)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) Wow, the GA himself! Still posting from the barrel in your cell? Thanks for the reply. But I think I'd disagree on that point--many of the planes in the game are just regular planes (I bought the game to see what all the hype was about). For (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
|
|
Nice work! I have some pics of CVN-65 that I pulled from the web just in case I'd stumble on LFB's collection of gray .) Never thought about doing it microscale :) Again, well done! (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: Crimson Skies
|
|
(...) I'm glad you feel inspired to build Crimson Skies. However, one of the tenets of the Crimson Skies style is that the planes are sort of futuristically shaped, yet in a 1942 style. So they do a lot of rearranging of common aircraft elements (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
| |
| | Crimson Skies
|
|
Hi all I've seen Crimson Skies posted to .space before, so I thought I'd see what you all think. (also post to .military) Here's the SkyWolf, armed to the teeth with four machine guns and a vicious turn radius ;-) After Mod: (URL) Deeplinks: (2 (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
|
