To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.militaryOpen lugnet.build.military in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Military / *1643 (-10)
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) I don't think it's the shape of your plane that makes it a stretch for CS as much as it's the high-tech looking weaponry. Exchange that stuff for some large primitive looking machine guns and I think you'd be a lot closer to the CS style... (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) While I like Andrews plane, and can see where you classify it as 'conventional', my question is - how unconventional is too unconventional? I know this borders on threadjacking or bumping, but I've been wondering if my (URL) latest bird> was (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) I just saw this looking around on brickshelf yesterday, and was very impressed. I like that you managed to capture the shape of the carrier in a relatively small MOC. Daniel Rubin (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) Not really. I don't think you understand what I was trying to point out. Your plane follows the very typical composition with two large wings forward, with a standard tail design. It looks like any given forward-prop-driven plane dating from (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
I feel kindah silly replying to my own post, but I want to let you all know that I uploaded more pictures to the Brickshelf gallery, and I also updated the MOCpages site. (URL) Gallery: (URL) some people want to know if I'm going to make a mini (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.build.microscale)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) Wow, the GA himself! Still posting from the barrel in your cell? Thanks for the reply. But I think I'd disagree on that point--many of the planes in the game are just regular planes (I bought the game to see what all the hype was about). For (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
Nice work! I have some pics of CVN-65 that I pulled from the web just in case I'd stumble on LFB's collection of gray .) Never thought about doing it microscale :) Again, well done! (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: Crimson Skies
 
(...) I'm glad you feel inspired to build Crimson Skies. However, one of the tenets of the Crimson Skies style is that the planes are sort of futuristically shaped, yet in a 1942 style. So they do a lot of rearranging of common aircraft elements (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Crimson Skies
 
Hi all I've seen Crimson Skies posted to .space before, so I thought I'd see what you all think. (also post to .military) Here's the SkyWolf, armed to the teeth with four machine guns and a vicious turn radius ;-) After Mod: (URL) Deeplinks: (2 (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.military, FTX)
 
  Re: CVN - 65 USS Enterprise Aircraft Carrier MOC
 
(...) Hey Mark, I just saw this on Brickshelf and ran over here to sing its praises. Very well done. Like Joe, the thing that stands out most toe is the offset angle of the runway. The way you did the hull is very cool, too. I crossposted this to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.build.microscale)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR