| | Re: a second look?
|
|
(...) WOW! Can't believe I missed that 1st time around. great form & functionality all around the VTOL's are wicked cool the use of pieces for the engines are inventive & 'fit' the unique design just right i like how the whole thing was built big (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
|
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
(...) Heh yeah -- it's pretty odd. Ran across the site some years ago and have checked on it now and again. Without going too off topic, it's more the fact that one of the vacated towers was left standing for someone TO be able to claim. Kind of the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
|
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
"Andrew Summersgill" <ajs@nospamblahblahblah.co.uk> wrote in message news:HGDxvB.205x@lugnet.com... (...) they (...) they (...) exception (...) trio (...) that's actually a very good idea... *looks at his technic pieces* and feasible, too! (...) oh (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
|
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
(...) that the (...) a (...) Sealand.. but (...) weathered look (...) heh, everybody comments on the weathered look of my MOCs, I wish I could take credit for it... unfortuantely I can't, as it's just a side effect of having a lego collection almost (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|
|
| | Re: Another small slew of military vehicles
|
|
(...) of (...) of (...) Hmmm. Sounds like they need one of two things: 1) Deployable helicopter landing pad that can retract like a drawbridge from the side of the tower. OR: 2) Cage with some medicine in it for the gerbils. I guess it really boils (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.military)
|