 | | Re: Welcome Part Two , Plus Links —Ashley Glennon
| | | | Brian, Until late 1999 to early 2000, small scale building really did not seem to have a common name. Of course, there were references to quarter-scale, half-scale, etc. but as far as I know, nothing stuck. The irony is, prior to the advent of the (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.microscale)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Welcome Part Two , Plus Links —Brian Muzas
| | | | | | In lugnet.build.microscale, Ashley Glennon writes: [snip] (...) Feel free. I know I'm not the only person who used the terms classic, half-classic, and quarter-classic in the past, but I don't know who originated the terms. (...) Interesting (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.microscale)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Welcome Part Two , Plus Links —Kevin Wilson
| | | | | Ashley Glennon wrote in message ... (...) "Classic" scale was in common use as a term when I started on LUGNET in 1999, although few people apart from Gary Istok built in it. (See here for an example post: (URL) ). When I started in Lego in the (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.microscale)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Welcome Part Two , Plus Links —Brian Muzas
| | | | | (...) When I was growing up, I caught the tail end of proto-minifigs. My very first set (that I remember) was a 111 universal set which had a maxifig and the transitional 3-wide by 4-high door that opened; I think my first set with proto-minifigs (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.microscale)
| | | | | | |
