 | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) Surely you're not forgetting Army of Darkness?!? If that's not a stop-motion tour de force, I don't know what is! But I agree that something satisfying was lost when the film industry collectively decided to move to CGI... Dave! (18 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) Gimme some sugar, baby! Dave K - Klaatu, Barada, Nic-*coug* *cough* (18 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) And now with added (URL) singing>. Tim (18 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) Oh no, no indeed! I don't forget the glorious Army of Darkness. But considering it came out one year after T2 and one year before Jurassic Park, it was essentially already a throwback to an era whose time had past. A eulogy of sorts. As was (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) Stop action isn't dead, but it's definitely "retro." Check out Aardman's "Chicken Run" or "Curse of the Were-Rabbit." Talk about attention to detail; there's practically a sight-gag in every frame! Just watch the credits for any modern CGI (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) Remember, Spielberg's JP wasn't all about CGI (though I'll forget the first time I saw the wide shot of the brachs at the lake, or the stampeding Gallimimus scene). He used puppets and also autoerotic dinos as well;-) JOHN (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| "John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:JCA1Kx.BG8@lugnet.com... <SNIPPAGE> He used puppets and also autoerotic dinos as well;-) (...) No wonder the dinos went extinct if they were all self-satisfying themselves instead of mating with a (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) No, I'm pretty sure it was for (URL) reason. JOHN (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.pun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) That's true, but Aardman's stuff doesn't count because it's perfect--and it's a vile blasphemy to suggest otherwise. Its inclusion would automatically distort analysis of any other film!!! (...) My three-year-old is, surprise-surprise, very (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: ED-209
|
| (...) I feel your pain; my son is two-and-a-half, and I could probably play Mater to 'yer Light'nin, if ya know whatta mean... Without going into painful detail, I think Pixar is still a few years ahead of DreamWorks or anyone else in the art. With (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
