To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 11717
11716  |  11718
Subject: 
GAT-X105 Aile Strike Gundam
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build.mecha
Followup-To: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:12:21 GMT
Highlighted: 
!! (details)
Viewed: 
43 times
  


Brickshelf Gallery: http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=104719

First some links for those unfamilar with this design: http://www.mahq.net/mecha/gundam/seed/gat-x105+aqme-x01.htm
http://www.hlj.com/scripts/hljpage.cgi?BAN914211


After accumulated enough bricks, I decided to start one of my dream MOC projects - a large scale, highly detailed Gundam. I picked Strike because it is one of the better design in recent years, most of it’s surfaces are flat, and I haven’t seen one made in LEGO yet.

First I wanted to have two trans-yellow 1x1 plates as the visors (a.k.a. eyes). That basically defined the scale of the head, and the rest of the body. Click hinges were the obvious choice for the joints, since warm gears are too large for this scale. It took several weekends to put it together - head, hands, arms, foots, legs, lower body, upper body, shield, beam rifle, and the aile back pack. I aimed to finish and show it at the Hobby Show in Toronto last weekend, and I made it in time.

As for the result, IMO...

Good:
I really like the head and the upper body. The back pack is also quite good.
It is quite posable, with double hinged fingers and knees, but...
It’s big, and is quite a presence at he show.

Bad:
The scale is quite off in some area, especially the lower body. The legs are too far apart, limited by the technic click hinges. The legs should be longer and thicker. The head and the chest looks too big due to the legs. I already try tweaking it but didn’t work out too well
It’s too big, hence heavy. The click hinges are too weak for the weight. Even without the back pack it will fall without the stand. The arms can only hold a few angles when carrying the shield and the beam rifle.
I added a cockpit since there is room, but it is totally off scale.
I wish I can use dark gray on the body instead of black.
No Armor Schnieder. Not enough room for it.

From the Hobby Show:
Some fans recognized it right away. Well Gundam Seed is currently running on YTV so that is expected.
Heard many parents said: “Look, a transformer!”... ^_^;;


Well next time I think I will try a smaller scale, or have a better scale plan. LMKWYT



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: GAT-X105 Aile Strike Gundam
 
In lugnet.announce.moc, Ka-On Lee wrote: <snip> (...) This thing is friggin' awesome Ka-On. There's so much SNOT hanging off it I feel a sinus cold coming on just looking at it. :) Seriously though, the SNOT work is phenomenal. The head is a (...) (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
  Re: GAT-X105 Aile Strike Gundam
 
Wow, wow, wow, (...) If you could get those flat techic plate click hinges, those would probably suit you well for the knees in this scale. (SW AT-AT or AT-TE joints) I should say though, I think you captured the Gundam quite well! (...) Don't (...) (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
  Re: GAT-X105 Aile Strike Gundam
 
(...) wow! an excellent lego translation! i knew it was the aile strike from gundam seed without even looking at the folder discription. though i've never seen the series, i am quite familiar with the various gundams just from studying pics from the (...) (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
  Re: GAT-X105 Aile Strike Gundam
 
(...) I'll agree with both your pros and your cons. The backpack looks great, I like the hands, and the upper body is exactly right. I don't think the legs need to be longer, but I think they would be improved if they were "beefier". If you built up (...) (20 years ago, 11-Nov-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
  Re: GAT-X105 Aile Strike Gundam
 
(...) Oh wow, I checked out the construction great job! (...) Fine choice I'd say. (...) Excellent. (...) I agree. It big, That's why I like it too! (...) Efforts for the next round? Incorporate in to future attempts? (...) LMAO, I get that too. hee (...) (20 years ago, 28-Nov-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)

6 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR