 | | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
|
(...) built (...) Steve, You may be referring to some of my models... which are all rendered images... I have built physically enough of each of the models (some are 100% physically built) that I post on Pallas Spaceworks to make sure that they work (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Overkill-the story of an M-tron mech
|
|
Thanks for the correction. No problem about the misunderstanding, I still sometimes have trouble understanding myself. Even the wife has trouble with me. :) -- ~mek~ (remove cc from atkincc to email me) Dave Johann wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
|
(...) built (...) Ohh... I tought that you meant that... nevermind. If you look at my "Perdition" model, the Ldrawing of it looks like it wouldn't stand up if it's life depended on it, and it stand just fine IRL. Thanks, glad you like 'em! ~Nick (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
|
(...) digital pictures of them...standing...so it's obvious they're capable of vertical attitude. The ones I'm talking about are the ones that _aren't_ built first. It doesn't _really_ bother me anyway - like I said, many of them are still (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
|
(...) Yes, I could tell the quadraped one would. The other one looks pretty solid too. Nice work, by the way! I've seen others, though, that pretty much could not have been built first, at least not standing up... .Steve "Attack life, it's going to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
