 | | Re: Overkill-the story of an M-tron mech
|
|
Thanks for the correction. No problem about the misunderstanding, I still sometimes have trouble understanding myself. Even the wife has trouble with me. :) -- ~mek~ (remove cc from atkincc to email me) Dave Johann wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
|
(...) built (...) Ohh... I tought that you meant that... nevermind. If you look at my "Perdition" model, the Ldrawing of it looks like it wouldn't stand up if it's life depended on it, and it stand just fine IRL. Thanks, glad you like 'em! ~Nick (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
|
(...) digital pictures of them...standing...so it's obvious they're capable of vertical attitude. The ones I'm talking about are the ones that _aren't_ built first. It doesn't _really_ bother me anyway - like I said, many of them are still (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
|
(...) Yes, I could tell the quadraped one would. The other one looks pretty solid too. Nice work, by the way! I've seen others, though, that pretty much could not have been built first, at least not standing up... .Steve "Attack life, it's going to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Sneak peak at new mech
|
|
Holy ... that's huge... Makes my multi-legged mecha look silly... I do have to agree with Mark though, that it needs a bigger top, and how about a head? Keep up the terrific work! (...) like. (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
