Subject:
|
Re: Navy Destroyer MOC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 18:57:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
474 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build, Jennifer Clark writes:
> Marc Cook wrote:
>
> > Some teaser pictures are up:
> > http://www.netpresonic.com/lego/ddgn
>
> These are really good, I especially like the way you have edited the photos such as
> the waves and atmosphere in "resque1.jpg" - "inthemist.jpg" also really appeals to
> me, it is very reminiscent of older battleship photos.
>
> While I'm not so great on naval terminology either, the size of the model seems more
> in line with the MTBs (motor torpedo boats?) from WWII, although I don't think the
> radar masts were so complex in MTBs :-). The fact that you have torpedos hanging
> from the sides certainly adds to this effect for me!
>
> Jennifer Clark
Thank you. Yes. Strange but after shooting this model I realized it
needs to be much bigger to really give the impression of being
a destroyer. It's definetly has the size to be a minifig scale MTB
of WWII. Just saw a great show about them on the History Channel.
Am I just got a large shipment of bricks....hmmmm. I usually edit
my first rendition into a more refined final model as is the
case with my two helicopters ( http://www.netpresonic.com/lego ).
Well the construction company screwed up when developing this (me). I
failed to integrate internal torpedo launchers. It's cheaper
to just slap them onto the sides.
The waves and atmosphere courtesy of paint shop pro -- like version 4.0.
Oldie but a goodie.
- Marc
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Navy Destroyer MOC
|
| (...) the waves and atmosphere in "resque1.jpg" - "inthemist.jpg" also really appeals to me, it is very reminiscent of older battleship photos. While I'm not so great on naval terminology either, the size of the model seems more in line with the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.build)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
