To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 854
853  |  855
Subject: 
Re: Flattened Primitives (was Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad, lugnet.build
Followup-To: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:03:02 GMT
Viewed: 
26 times
  
"Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> writes:

I don't like having this list (and having to keeping it up-to-date),
but it seems that many part authors are lazy or ignorant and write
lines like "1 16  x y z  10 0 0  0 0 0  0 0 10 4-4disc.dat"

That is wrong?  Gee, I had no idea.  I've used lines like that a lot,
because I've seen them used in other part files, and they seemed to be
more elegant than "1 16  x y z  10 0 0  0 1 0  0 0 10 4-4disc.dat" when
the primitive is flat in y-direction anyway.

If it is wrong to flatten the primitive, I'll stop doing that.

Followup-To: lugnet.cad,lugnet.cad.dev

Fredrik



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Flattened Primitives (was Re: 1x1 and 2x2 chess sets)
 
(...) I agree. (...) It's not that simple. Together with the POV substitution string I also have other data like the BoundingBox of the primitive, which is used e.g. in the automatic camera positioning. I think it is troublesome to have this kind of (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad, lugnet.build)

5 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR