| |
I also have a very high failure rate, mostly because I'm easily distracted
and tend to go off on construction tangents. A typical building session for
me goes something like this: ::cobble, cobble, cobble:: Hm. This would
make an interesting fuselage for a space fighter. ::cobble, cobble,
cobble:: Oh. Submarine. ::cobble, cobble, cobble:: This is going
nowhere. I'll put this interesting lump aside and try working on that lump
I started two weeks ago. ::cobble, cobble, cobble:: Moon buggy. ::cobble,
cobble, cobble:: Tank? ::cobble, cobble, cobble:: Oh man, it's already
midnight. ::cobble, cobble, cobble:: The Bat Lord's Evil Steam Driven
Battlefield Death Machine! I can improve this (big mistake). ::cobble,
cobble cobble:: How did that go? ::cobble, cobble, cobble:: Okay. It's a
mech. ::cobble, cobble, cobble:: Hm. Nothing left except this interesting
lump that looks nothing like the interesting lump I started with. Oh well.
I guess I should try to get three hours of sleep now.
I'm amazed whenever I actually finish something. Even when I take the full
model visualization approach I always end up tweaking the result, usually to
death (aka, catastrophic tweaking).
-Doug
Paul Hartzog <panarchy23@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:G999Fu.6uv@lugnet.com...
> ok
> here's a question for all builders
> but particularly space
>
> i usually start 3 or 4 MOCs and abandon
> them once i realize they are going nowhere,
> BEFORE i get one that is really working
> which i then finish
>
> I am wondering,
> what's the typical success ratio out there?
> am i the only one who doesn't have every
> MOC turn out wonderful on the first try ;-)
>
> thx
> -paul
--
^V^^V^
I am: Damraska@Excite.com
Minifig Suns: http://pages.prodigy.net/damraska/
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
