To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 640
639  |  641
Subject: 
Re: Update on Virtual Plans
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build
Date: 
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 17:23:23 GMT
Viewed: 
2249 times
  
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:43:35 GMT, Fredrik Glöckner
<fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:

> blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
> 
> >  Interesting, I just pushed some numbers through Excel, and it looks
> >  like 12L beams are the only beams suited for diagonal bracing.  They
> >  can be placed at two different pitches (advancing 6 or 8
> >  stud-widths).
> 
> True, this is because it makes a phytagorean trinagle, right, with
> 6-8-10 sides.  (A multiple of 3-4-5.)

Right.  It was easier for my brain to set up a spreadsheet and try each
combination of beam-length and stud-pitch than to work out which beams
are the right length to make up the hypotenuse(sp?) of a pythagorean
triangle.

Note: actually, you can use any length beams as the diagonal brace
between other beams.  You just don't a spacing on the other beams that
fits with lego-standard.

> I've also used this fact to make a modular tower suitable for a creeping
> crane (that's the correct term, right?).  So far, only the tower is
> done.  If you're interested, sneak a peek at
> 
>    http://www.math.uio.no/~fredrigl/technic/creeping-crane/

Neat pics.

> Do anybody else have a design for a crane tower that is efficient and
> nice?  It shouldn't have too many pieces, but still be rigid.  My design
> has a tad too many pieces, I guess, but I think it's cool to be able to
> make each section from four identical "panel" elements.

No matter what, I think constructions like these take too many pieces.

> >  I'd like to be able to pick up the entire model when it's actually
> >  complete (even if I need a friend or two to help me).
> 
> D'you mean you're actually going to complete it?  You've got that many
> transparent pieces and so on?  *boggle*

Well, since the design is nowhere near complete, I can make any plan I
want.  But the transparent pieces aren't going to be the problem.  I've
been slowly accumulating those for some time.  I've got a lot of 12H
dome pieces, and most of the pieces I need to build the greenhouse, as
it depicted on the web pages.  The real problem is that I have nowhere
near enough Technic pieces to build the frame.  And then I need a ton of
large plates to put in floors.

I don't seem to design lightweight.  All of the model studies I've done
use a lot of pieces.

Steve



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR