Subject:
|
Re: Using airtanks on 8868
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 00:00:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1603 times
|
| |
|
|
John Morgan wrote in message ...
> That lack of control of the cylinders has been my experience too. You • really
> have to barely open the valve to be able to stop in partially extended
> movement. I wonder if you designed a cam that would squish the tubing past • the
> valve, maybe using gearing so the movement of the cam would be very slow, • then
> you might gain the finer control of the movement of the cylinders. the • valve
> would then become the "on /off" and the cam section adjusting the available
> pressure .
> Take care : )
> John
I have thought of using different valves. If one could use a valve based
upon pressure (slower pressure increases). This would allow a slower
response to the increasing pressure.
Eric
My god! I just read what I wrote and realized my engineering degree did not
go to waste! I am a geek!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Using airtanks on 8868
|
| (...) Hi Fredrik, That lack of control of the cylinders has been my experience too. You really have to barely open the valve to be able to stop in partially extended movement. I wonder if you designed a cam that would squish the tubing past the (...) (27 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.build)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
