Subject:
|
Re: A small car
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:51:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1690 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, J. Spencer Rezkalla wrote:
> For detail, I think six wide is the minimum width to work with that allows for a
> variety of sufficiently different vehicles and still functions reasonably well
> within the scales found in train layouts. If I had my way, I'd really want to
> build in 5-wide - but I find the limitations on axle sets and windshields are
> too restrictive.
I agree--I grew up thinking all cars should be four wide, but six is where it's
at if you want it to be more detailed.
> Mustang and 300C. Since I typically use the 33deg slope panel for all my
> windshields, I'll use wedge plates for the roof to give the illusion of
> curvature in the squarish windshield. I'll also add a few tiles to the roof
I think this is the key--it's the illusion or pinching of shapes to make them
look different than what they really are.
> There's probably more, but getting tired of typing. :)
No, this is useful stuff! It's good to hear from a pro, I love your designs!
Calum
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
