To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 15752
15751  |  15753
Subject: 
Re: butt-to-butt connections
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim
Date: 
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:37:16 GMT
Viewed: 
3209 times
  
In lugnet.build, Shaun Sullivan wrote:

Prompted by this thread, I went back and did some further fiddling with my bricks. It turns out that the skeleton arms fit neatly in next to the tubing at the bottom of a brick- any brick, and the other half can fit into the end of another brick. This way, you aren’t limited to the log bricks etc while using butt-to-butt connections, but you can use ALL bricks. The trouble is, you’ll need a SCARRRRY number of skeleton arms to pull it off on a larger scale.

Legoswami Samarth



Message is in Reply To:
  butt-to-butt connections
 
I'm soliciting solutions to a not-unfamiliar SNOT-construction quandry: What's the best way to attach brown bricks butt-end to butt-end (the ends opposite the studs) securely, using only brown pieces that are readily available (i.e. available in (...) (20 years ago, 14-Feb-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.schleim, FTX) ! 

9 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR