| |
In lugnet.animation, Mike Thorn wrote:
> At 12:03 PM 10/6/2003, you wrote:
> > [bigger snip]
> >
> > Ah..., but you don't really need the back and the front controlled by
> > pistons do
> > you?
> >
> > I would think that keeping the front hinged and the back actuated would
> > give you
> > what you want. With two pistons ganged together, you can achieve tilt down,
> > level and tilt up. Then you have four more pistons to do whatever you want.
>
> You really don't *need* both sides actuated, but it allows one to raise the
> platform as well. Not really necessary, I suppose.
>
> I presume you mean two pistons ganged end-to-end. I think this would work
> much better, but so far have not found any really good ways to do this
> without putting undue stress on at least some of the connection. Do you
> have a good geometry in mind?
It just so happens that I have a good geometry :^)
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=38106
[snip]
> Very true. I'll have to try that. Thanks for the idea!
Sure. It is always a pleasure to talk to you Mike.
>
> ~Mike
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pneumatic Camera Tilt Unit
|
| (...) You really don't *need* both sides actuated, but it allows one to raise the platform as well. Not really necessary, I suppose. I presume you mean two pistons ganged end-to-end. I think this would work much better, but so far have not found any (...) (23 years ago, 6-Oct-03, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
