 | | Re: 1996 sets now accepted on kl.net —John Morgan
|
| | | (...) is there going to be some system of sets needed and then folks who agree to do a particular set so there isnt a lot of duplication of effort? thanks! John "willing to scan but I like a plan : )) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 1996 sets now accepted on kl.net —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | so you have 1996 sets that you are prepared to scan in. can you start with any aquazone (aquanauts first) folowed by castle? (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1996 sets now accepted on kl.net —John Morgan
|
| | | | (...) can you start with any (...) actually I am not sure what sets from 96 I have pre-dark ages, my major focus was technic. Sadly I trashed a number of instructions from that time,( The covers all looked the same to me <grin>)... still, that was a (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1996 sets now accepted on kl.net —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) to (...) idea (...) Well, it doesn't sound like you're going to rush out and start scanning, but I should probably point out that before you (or anyone else reading this) do anything, there's a couple points to be aware of. 1: Jonathan Wilson (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 1996 sets now accepted on kl.net —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) his (...) scans that kevin lost in a server problem. therefore 1996 sets that are listed in there are not available for kevin to put up. (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | | |
