Subject:
|
Re: Escher Hands (was Re: Gone soft...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:47:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
564 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Thomas Garrison writes:
> In lugnet.general, Richard Marchetti writes:
>
> > Okay, I tried to get something close to the Escher drawing hands that are
> > drawing each other into existence, the results can be seen here:
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/blueofnoon/escher/escher.jpg
>
> It looks good to me. . .
>
> > I was a little disappointed with the resulting render for several reasons.
>
> > Another complaint is that there is no way that one 3D object can look like
> > it's drawing the other into plastic existence -- drawing with a stylus has
> > almost nothing to do with creating 3D objects in 3D, so you lose Escher's
> > contextual joke immediately. Plus, there's no way to traverse that silly
> > space between 2D and 3D as does Escher with his drawing -- this Escher piece
> > requires conceptual/visual fakery that is probably easiest to achieve with
> > paper and pencil in 2D where 3D is suggested by some shading of a
> > conceptually "3D object" which is actually just some lines on 2D paper.
>
> So this suggests to me that the translation of media should, to preserve the
> meaning of the piece, involve a translation of what is depicted. In other
> words: why not show the two hands building each other?
>
> TWS Garrison
I have agree with TWS here. Two hand building each other would be great.
Nevertheless, your current version, is pretty nifty too. (Time for a new
background.)
-Jason
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Jason Spears
Michlug - http://www.michlug.org/
Brickbay Store - http://www.geocities.com/spearjr/brickcentral.html
Lego Page - http://www.brickbay.com/store.asp?p=jrspears
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
