|
|
 | | Re: 10 Starship Designs
|
| (...) I certainly didn't mean to say that your stuff doesn't look cool. My point is, why bother with LDraw at all? Why not use a more sophisticated general-purpose modeling program? (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: NO LEGOS HARMED Was: 10 Starship Designs
|
| Jamal, Eric, & All, (...) LDraw (...) occupying (...) more. Indeed. I think they are creative, even if some don't, which is fine as well. Lord knows it would be boring if we are all the same. Scott S. -- Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: NO LEGOS HARMED Was: 10 Starship Designs
|
| Thank you Eric. I can't wait to show you more. Jamal (...) actually, (...) the (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: NO LEGOS HARMED Was: 10 Starship Designs
|
| (...) It's not hard to figure out how you did it, but I think most people view LDraw (and associated programs) as being ways of documenting things you can actually, physically do. In other words, having two Lego elements in LDraw occupying the same (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | NO LEGOS HARMED Was: 10 Starship Designs
|
| Since it seems a matter of great concern to some of us, let me reiterate once more NO LEGO was harmed, cut or chopped by me to make any creation, not now or in the future. (Though when I was younger I was guilty of biting the sideburns off of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.build)
|
|
