 | | Re: You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
|
Erin Windross wrote in message ... (...) wings!) (...) counting (...) Sorry Erin but a plane with those dimensions would NOT be welcome at Millennium City Airport. ;-) Why? Because the main runway is only 192 studs long and a paltry 18 studs wide. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
|
In lugnet.build, Kela Akira Kitkowski writes: <snip> (...) <snip> Not really. This is a family NG and the Terms & Conditions explicitly state: "5. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
|
(...) No, not really. (...) That would be really cool! See if you can find it. :D eric (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
|
Don't feel too bad; my Father once built outta my legos (as a kid) a big-ass (can I say ass on here?) plane that almost looked like one of those cargo planes with propellers. I think I have a photo of the model stuffed into my boxes, so if I can dig (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
|
I was planning to build a realistic minifig scale Jumbo 747, then I figured out the dimensions of it, consequently I quit the whole project, because: A: It would be near 30 studs wide(God knows what that would be with the wings!) B: It would also be (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Replacement Rigging (was Re: Ironclad _La Gloire_ virtually complete)
|
|
(...) I've used them, but in "wrap" form--sandwiched into some other construction. But the cording seems too thick to hold well between bricks. The thread, as you noted, will work between 'em--the problem is that I only had one piece of unused (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.boats, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Containers
|
|
(...) There is a standard LEGO Container size which lorries, trucks and the 1991 sea ports all used - 4x8 in plan. The Maersk and Color Line trucks have different size containers. Set 1651 the old Maersk truck: (URL) 6 wide containers I think they (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Ironclad _La Gloire_ virtually complete--mini-page up
|
|
(...) Have you considered taking Lego string out of convenient unused winches? I've found that in general, clamping the end of a string between bricks is as good a hold as the little 1x1 round ends. Come to think of it, you could actually even use (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.boats, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Containers
|
|
I've been on and off thinking about containers (for ships, trucks, and trains). One of the things I'm wondering is if all the LEGO sets which have containers use the same dimensions? The other thing I'm wondering is if I should set my own standards (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Ironclad _La Gloire_ virtually complete--mini-page up
|
|
(...) I'll see if I can get any. It is a bit threadbare--I don't have enough TLG-approved rig to do what I want to do, not to mention not having any sails cut! :) The problem with the rig is that it's very hard to photograph, being black and in a (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.boats, lugnet.build)
|
