|
|
 | | Re: MOC 8436: Cranetruck
|
| (...) Well in a way you are correct. I haven't seen the black unmarked vehicle but do have received an invitation to cooperate with LEGO as a freelancer for at least 1 project... :-) Nate (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.technic, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOC 8436: Cranetruck
|
| (...) Thanks Nathan! It's always good to explore new things. That's why I try to build new and inspiring things all the time. It's also good to get a clue what your limitations are and I'm still making progression... I don't have the excavator. I (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.technic, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOC 8436: Cranetruck
|
| (...) Hi Philo, Thanks for your kind reply. I do my best. I've spent a week to come to this model and it still has some minor flaws that might need improvement, but maybe that's just my thought.. Nate (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, lugnet.technic, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Archangel Preview
|
| (...) Well, I took those pictures, edited, and uploaded them after posting. PRetty fast moderation on b-shelf these days. (...) Yeah, blocky it is, I should probably fix that if I rework the model like I usually end up doing. The chicken-thing is my (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: That can't be good.....
|
| SNIPPIFIED This is just an update to let you know that I felt this was worthy of an MOCPage: (URL) Legoswami Samarth (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
|
