 | | Re: Minifig-scale mech pages posted!
|
|
(...) Sorry, those URL's should be: (3 URLs) I must have got too excited. -Michael (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: More studs in holes...
|
|
I think that the main reason that the studs fit tightly in the sides of the technic beams is that there is no 'give' in the plastic that grips the stud, as is there typically when they connect to the bottom of a brick, or a plate, or what have you. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: More studs in holes...
|
|
I reexamined my rack-and-pinion design, and couldn't find another easy-to-implement way to mount the bricks, other than the studs-in-axle holes method. So, I'm pleased that I _probably_ won't wreck any pieces. --Doug Wilcox WordSmith Digital (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: More studs in holes...
|
|
(...) IMHO, of course. --Todd (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: More studs in holes...
|
|
(...) I don't think it's correct that such a configuration was unintended. In fact, I think it most definitely *was* intended. All the classic LEGO measurements are magic multiples of 1/5 the standard interstud spacing, which also equals 1/6 the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.build)
|
