|
|
 | | Re: Smith
|
| (...) That is EXACTLY why I named it Smithereens. When I was working on Smith I actually imagined it blasting its opponents into bits and pieces, and then the name Smithereens strike me. Nice compliments, but you might want to put it on hold until I (...) (21 years ago, 24-Sep-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Smith
|
| (...) Thanks. But like Frank Kopanitsanos said, it’ll probably look better if the shoulders were beefed up a bit. (...) Guess that's one advantage of having limited parts; you tend to make the best out of what you have. (...) Do you think (...) (21 years ago, 24-Sep-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Smith
|
| (...) Thanks! If I actually have "chains" for the "guns" then I would call them "chain guns" But as of now their just "guns". ;) And yes, it’s a blade. I’ve always like combo weapons like those in Virtual On (Temjin’s beam riffle) and Final Fantasy (...) (21 years ago, 24-Sep-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Phantasm
|
| OMG, that is increadibly unussual! I almost can't see the construction. Limiting, but a challange none the less! I'll get you Ranjo! If I can see you/it that is! Wow! e (URL) (21 years ago, 23-Sep-03, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Phantasm
|
| (...) Jeff, are you feeling well? A brick mecha? :-) The wow factor of the clear elements is immense. But to be real honest, I think that's about all this one has going for it. Some nice construction elements (I particulary like the area around the (...) (21 years ago, 23-Sep-03, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
|
