 | | BayLUG in the News
|
| Well, I'm a little disappointed. Much of what is said in the article is not what I said in the interview. Oh well. Below is the link and the article should be in print in today's Chronicle in the "96 Hours" section. (URL) (16 years ago, 11-Dec-08, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| | | | | Re: BayLUG in the News
|
| (...) Having worked with a few news outlets local to me and seeing how they can mangle the most simple facts I think it is a great article. The only negatives would be the reference to "unwashed masses" and a lack of a URL for your website. Both (...) (16 years ago, 11-Dec-08, to lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, FTX)
| | | | | Re: BayLUG in the News
|
| (...) It doesn't. Last weekend was the first one being open since the article came out, and I heard all weekend we were having to explain to people why stuff mentioned in the article was not actually on display. The public was very confused. Russell (16 years ago, 16-Dec-08, to lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, FTX)
| | | | | Re: BayLUG in the News
|
| (...) Ouch! That has got to be disheartening. I hope no one got angry or too upset. (16 years ago, 16-Dec-08, to lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, FTX)
| | | | | Re: BayLUG in the News
|
| (...) I handled some of those cases Saturday. People were a little confused, but not angry. I explained that the reporter misunderstood, and had done the interview before we ever set up the display so he didn't see it, and they were mollified. (16 years ago, 17-Dec-08, to lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
| |
