|
In lugnet.admin.curators, Greg Perry writes:
> Does the sub-newsgroup lugnet.publish.cinema have its own curator or
> administrator? I'd like to get the reference to The Animated Brick Company
> under Links & Resources updated to a valid link address.
>
> I've created a LUGNET-based page for showing off my videos and would like to
> see the old address for Animated Brick Co. changed to:
> http://www.lugnet.com/~250/brickmation/
>
> I wasn't sure if sub-group like this would have its own curator or whether
> it would be handled by the lugnet.publish curator (if there is someone that
> occupies that position and can help since cinema comes under this umbrella,
> I'd appreciate it).
>
> If there is no curator for publish.cinema then I'd like to volunteer my
> services since LEGO animation and related topics remains one of my primary
> interests and like so many others I seem to be hanging out here at LUGNET
> just about every day any way...
>
> Thanks!
Near as I can figure (Suz or Dan or whoever, please correct me if I am
wrong), curating is hierarchichal unless someone else has a subgroup. When I
picked up .trains I also asked for .trains.org... which I got too. But I
ALSO got curator (curative?? no, not quite :-) ) powers in subgroups of
.trains.org (such as trains.org.scltc, a group that I think was created
AFTER I got the curatorship) even though I didn't ask for them explicitly.
So what I am saying is that if there is a curator for .publish, they have
curatorship of publish.cinema too, unless it was calved off. That's my
theory, anyway. I dunno if there is or not though.
FUT to admin.curators because I'm asking a curatorship mechanics question.
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|