 | | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) At present is that really that important? At least with a collected list of suggestions it means that an alternate solution has somewhere to find ideas. I think you made it clear you weren't happy paying (what was asked) for BS in its current (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) So what do you, as LEGO Ambassadors, propose to do? (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
I'd like to see: 1. Not only the ability to tag photos with a pre-selected list of keywords (as BrickShelf does) but see only folders/photos tagged with those words (like MOCPages). Also filtering by filetype. If I don't use LDraw (for instance), I (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I just want Brickshelf to survive, that's all. If Brickshelf can be improved with more features, great. If Brickshelf needs to charge fees, fine. But for me, I don't want another Johnny-come-lately, just what has worked in the past and will (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I agree with most of the comments others have written. I would also like to add that I like the way Brickshelf allows you to see a lot of images on the same page – without excessive scrolling. When I'm browsing, I can see 30 images on the same (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
