|
|
 | | Re: LEGO marble runs
|
| (...) I agree, this is an excellent suggestion, and in fact it is a mystery to me that they are not doing it already. A few carefully designed specialised parts would almost certainly increase the mass appeal of such sets. While making tracks with (...) (14 years ago, 27-Dec-09, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.ambassadors)
| | | | | Re: LEGO marble runs
|
| (...) Wow - that's amazing, congratulations! I (and I expect others) would be very glad to see some close-up photos showing exactly how your construction works... (14 years ago, 27-Dec-09, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.ambassadors)
| | | | | Re: Thoughts on LEGO Non-Disclosure Agreement
|
| (...) While I may not be an Ambassador, I feel I can offer some guidance as to why the NDA may scare people. I think it's mainly because most people don't deal with them every day. It's a case of fear of the unknown and what the consequences will be (...) (15 years ago, 14-Jul-09, to lugnet.ambassadors)
| | | | | Thoughts on LEGO Non-Disclosure Agreement
|
| I also posted this (URL) an article> on my own site but there isn't more to read over there, unless you want to browse 1+ year-old archives of silly stuff. Now that the next cycle of LEGO Ambassadors is beginning, and I'm not part of the program for (...) (15 years ago, 13-Jul-09, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Cycle 7 Ambassadors
|
| (...) I agree that LUGNET is missing, but I believe that everybody who participates here is also (more) active somewhere else, LUGNET is a great inter-community resource but there are few people who consider LUGNET their main LUG site. On the other (...) (15 years ago, 9-Jul-09, to lugnet.ambassadors)
|
|
