To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.adventurersOpen lugnet.adventurers in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Adventurers / *391 (-5)
  Re: Adventurers in 2000?
 
(...) I (...) sure (...) Nah, I just felt I had dissapointed some *very* excited people and thought I should repeat why I posted what I posted. :-) Julie (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
 
  Re: Adventurers in 2000?
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:35:40 GMT, julie krenz uttered the following profundities... (...) apologies, should i have appeared rude. i was as excited as everyone else when reading it, even having read the magazine that morning, thinking i might have (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
 
  Re: Movie list
 
(...) I too has been out of office all week and missed the discussion. It was a good idea to call for adventure movies. But looking back it should have been "most inspiring" adventure movies and not "greatest", which made some argue about the (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
 
  Re: Movie list
 
(...) ~ me too! ditto to all that, and salutations to mark! later ~ craig (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
 
  Movie list
 
Well, this certainly flared up while I wasn't looking. I must have missed a staff meeting or something - I'll pay more attention in future. Just a quick note of support - I think the movie list thing was a cracker (that's a good thing). It shouldn't (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR