|
|
 | | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
| On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:35:40 GMT, julie krenz uttered the following profundities... (...) apologies, should i have appeared rude. i was as excited as everyone else when reading it, even having read the magazine that morning, thinking i might have (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Movie list
|
| (...) I too has been out of office all week and missed the discussion. It was a good idea to call for adventure movies. But looking back it should have been "most inspiring" adventure movies and not "greatest", which made some argue about the (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Movie list
|
| (...) ~ me too! ditto to all that, and salutations to mark! later ~ craig (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Movie list
|
| Well, this certainly flared up while I wasn't looking. I must have missed a staff meeting or something - I'll pay more attention in future. Just a quick note of support - I think the movie list thing was a cracker (that's a good thing). It shouldn't (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
| (...) Hmmm.... There are several .off-topic groups. Most of the stupid threads (sorry, but that's what I think of them as) end up being moved to .off-topic.fun. I never read the Adventurers Movie thread, which I assume this is about, mainly because (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
|
